Does anyone else think that Phillip was hand-picked for this due to his “amazing” ability to argue…?

Discussion: There are 8 Discussion Questions on Canvas, basically one bi-weekly. These are to be answered in roughly 300 words. They are your thoughts (after reviewing the material). Once an initial answer is posted, you will have access to others’ posts. Please reply to at least one other student’s post with a follow-up question, additional thought, disagreement, etc. Please respond if I ask you a question in your thread. For each discussion question, you will get 12 points for the initial post of adequate size and thought and 6 points for adequate replies. If you feel that you’d like to pad your grade, replying to your replies will certainly be noted if there are ever those “Can you round my 89.1% to a 90%?” questions. Initial posts are due on Fridays, all responses are due by Sundays. Choose one of the pages from this module to write about (Media Bias & Gun Control). Ask any questions you have, share your thoughts, discuss your insecurities. To get you started. What did you think of all those news outlets covering the “same story?” Did you catch how they all contradicted each other over simple facts? Could you hear the opinions flowing like a river in the more extreme outlets? Notice a difference in variety of guests, sources, etc. in the better ones? What about all the name calling…? And what about that gun control in Australia? What a show. Does anyone else think that Phillip was hand-picked for this due to his “amazing” ability to argue…? Political suicide??